I saw your clarification that the primary expert needs to be located in the USA.
I’m based outside the US, so I understand I wouldn’t meet that requirement for the main role. However, if the project has any scope for remote technical support, validation, or asynchronous review, I’d be interested in helping.
My recent work around PX4/QGroundControl has focused on reproducible log analysis, control-allocation behaviour, MAVLink integration, SITL/HIL validation, and reconstructing failures from telemetry and ULog evidence.
For example, I’ve recently been working with community-provided PX4 datasets to identify the first observable divergence, correlate it with configuration and allocator behaviour, and produce reproducible validation findings.
If that kind of supporting expertise is useful alongside the US-based expert, I’d be happy to discuss it.